I'm negotiating a B2B licensing deal for some technology.
I typically license it as a managed service, and don't share code, because I want to protect trade secrets.
A new potential client is hoping to build a lot of his service around my technology, and wants the source code. "What if you get hit by a bus?" "You're a small shop, what if you can't give me the desired uptime / SLA?"
How do you respond to these client concerns? I understand how, as a businessman, he wants to minimize risk, since my technology might become a crucial part of his offering. But I also can't just hand out the source.
License Open Source Licensing SLA
If your client is willing to pay for it, you escrow your code with a neutral third party. There are many firms that will provide this escrow service. You write a contact that specifies exactly when and how the source code will be released from escrow.
You basically place your software package's source code with a neutral third party. This party will release the source code to your customer under certain specified conditions. (One example might be your company goes bankrupt.) There are hundreds of companies that provide this service. Here are just a few.
Iron Mountain
Escrow Associates
Escrow Tech International
Typically you sign a contract that specifies under which conditions your software source code will be released to the other party. These services charge a fee. You typically have the big company, that is worried about what happens if you vanish, pay for the escrow fee. You also need a attorney to review this contract and you need to consider those legal fees as part of your bid to this company.
Finally, note that while your client may be quite happy with the escrowed software, programmers know that the source code is only one minor portion of a product. Getting something to work with just the source code is going to be difficult at best.
See question:
You can offer code escrow. He can choose the service and pay for it. Or he can hand you a boatload of cash and buy/license the IP
EDIT - I would push for selling a source license. However, you retain ownership and the license he gets is limited for specific use(s). You can get more revenue that way and he reduces risk.